Skip to content
Preptima
hardScenarioCase StudySeniorStaffLead

Your DevRel programme reports growing impressions, follower counts and packed conference sessions, but finance is asking what it returns. How would you show whether the work is driving adoption, and how would you defend the budget when you cannot attribute cleanly?

5 min readUpdated 2026-08-15

Answer

Short answer

Split your numbers into reach, engagement and behaviour, and only ever claim the behavioural ones as results. Where attribution is impossible, defend the programme with cohort comparisons, holdouts and counterfactual costs rather than an invented revenue figure.

In a strong developer relations answer, the proving devrel is working without attribution detail should connect the decision to a visible consequence.

Was this answer helpful?

Likely follow-ups

  • Your best-performing tutorial by traffic correlates with no measurable increase in successful API calls. What are the plausible explanations, and which would you test first?
  • Finance offers to fund either two advocates or one advocate plus a paid conference booth. What evidence would make you choose the booth?
  • How would you set up a holdout so that withholding developer content from a segment is defensible rather than reckless?
  • If your only usable metric were time-to-first-successful-call, what would you stop doing?

Related questions