You are asked to design a product that does not exist, and the setup is missing details you would need in real life. Do you point that out?
Yes, once and briefly, with an assumption attached. In a hypothetical product exercise the scored move is what follows. Separate gaps that change the design from gaps that do not, choose assumptions that keep the problem hard, write them where both of you can see them, and say which parts of the design depend on each.
Answer
Short answer
Yes, but once, briefly, and with a proposed assumption attached. In a hypothetical product interview, noticing the gap is the easy half. What gets scored is what you do next: whether you can tell a missing detail that changes the design from one that does not, whether the assumption you choose keeps the problem hard, and whether you name which decisions rest on it.
Was this answer helpful?
Likely follow-ups
- The interviewer answers your question with "what do you think?". What do you do with that?
- Halfway through, a detail you were given contradicts one from the start. How do you raise it?
- Which of your assumptions would you test first if this product were real, and how cheaply?
- When is a setup so unrealistic that saying so is the most useful thing you can do in the room?
Related questions
- Tell me about a time you had to deliver with unclear requirements or a deadline you did not believe in.mediumAlso on ambiguity and behavioural6 min
- In the room, the customer tells you a competitor has committed to something you cannot match. How do you respond?hardAlso on assumptions5 min
- Tell me about a time you had far more work than you could deliver. How did you handle it?mediumAlso on behavioural5 min
- The customer's ask is one sentence: they want to use AI on their claims data. You have six weeks. How do you get from that to something shippable?hardAlso on ambiguity7 min