How do you size safety stock, and what causes the bullwhip effect?
Answer
Short answer
Safety stock is the inventory you hold to buy a chosen service level against forecast error over the replenishment lead time, so it scales with the variability of demand and of lead time; the bullwhip arises because each tier reorders from its own buffered demand rather than the real one.
Keep demand forecasting explicit in the answer because that is the concept the interviewer is actually trying to test. A good demand forecasting explanation names the trade-off, the failure mode, and the evidence you would use before choosing. Use demand forecasting once more at the decision point so the answer reads as judgement rather than a detached example.
Keep demand forecasting explicit in the answer because that is the concept the interviewer is actually trying to test. A good demand forecasting explanation names the trade-off, the failure mode, and the evidence you would use before choosing.
Was this answer helpful?
Likely follow-ups
- Your supplier's lead time doubles in variability but not in mean. What happens to your stock?
- How would you forecast a product with six weeks of sales history?
- A promotion triples demand for one week. How should that be represented in the forecast?
- Which single piece of information sharing would most reduce the bullwhip in your supply chain?
Related questions
- Your reported forecast accuracy went up for two quarters and inventory and stockouts both got worse. How is that possible?hardAlso on demand-forecasting7 min
- Your test lifts conversion, but something else moved the wrong way. What are guardrail metrics, and when do they stop a launch?hardSame kind of round: concept5 min
- A churn model scores 0.94 AUC offline and barely beats the baseline in production. One of its strongest features is populated by a process that runs after the customer has already churned. Explain what happened and how you would fix it.mediumSame kind of round: concept5 min
- Your A/B test was configured for a 50/50 split but the data shows 53/47 across two million users. The result is significant and positive. What do you do?hardSame kind of round: concept5 min