Loading...
Loading...
Browse 4 real-world technical and behavioral interview questions about Cutover. Review scenarios, edge cases, and architectural best practices.
Write the entry criteria before the parallel run begins so the decision is a checklist rather than a mood, ramp through a stepped population with an abort condition at each step, and recognise that rollback stops meaning redeploy once the new system takes its first authoritative write.
Prove the new platform's opening position equals the old platform's closing position, account by account and in control totals, before you accept a single instruction on it. Balances are the tractable half - standing instructions, accrued interest and payments in flight across the boundary are what break.
Put a routing facade in front of the old system, migrate one business capability at a time, and treat dual-write as a reconciliation problem rather than two inserts: name a writer of record at every moment, shadow-compare before flipping reads, and sequence slices so value lands early.
Convert the open defects into business consequence and volume rather than counts, construct a phased or partial cutover as a real third option, and give the steering group one explicit recommendation with the conditions that would change it. A date treated as fixed while exit criteria stay negotiable is the failure to name.